Example for PuT operating indicators

The following example Example_LLE.ver (Illustration 205) is used to illustrate the indicator calculations. The description of the indicator categories pick up this example again. You can find the example in the following directory: ...\Users\Public\Public documents\PTV Vision\PTV Visum 2025\Example_Net\.

Illustration 205: Example network with two lines and volume data

Transport supply

The transport system of the demonstration example consists of two lines with two line routes per line (outward and return line routes), but partially shortened trips.

Table 236: Transport supply in Example_LLE.ver

Line

Start stop

Dest. stop

Length [km]

First dep.

tCur [min]

Last dep.

Run time [min]

Number of trips

Valid day

BUS >

10

40

27.5

06:07 AM

12:40 AM

6:07 PM

12:45 AM

19

daily

BUS <

40

10

27.5

6:02 AM

12:40 AM

6:02 PM

12:45 AM

19

daily

BUS >

30

40

7.5

5:37 AM

12:40 AM

5:37 PM

12:13 AM

19

weekdays

BUS <

40

30

7.5

6:29 AM

12:40 AM

6:29 PM

12:13 AM

19

weekdays

TRAIN >

20

40

10.0

6:29 AM

12:40 AM

6:29 PM

12:16 AM

19

daily

TRAIN <

40

20

10.0

6:09 AM

12:40 AM

6:09 PM

12:16 AM

19

daily

Projection factors and analysis time slices

The model contains an analysis period TI1 for the traffic during morning peak hours (8 a.m. to 9 a.m.). The projection factors on the analysis horizon for valid days are assigned accordingly (Using Visum: Specifying a calendar and valid days).

Table 237: Projection factors for the valid days in Example_LLE.ver

Valid day

Proj. factor transport supply

Proj. factor hourly costs

daily

365

365

weekdays

260

260

The projection factor for demand segment PuT is allocated as follows.

Table 238: Projection factor for the demand segment

Demand segment

Projection factor

PuT

365

Vehicles used

Table 239: Total capacity provided in the vehicles of example Example_LLE.ver

Vehicle type

Seat capacity

Total capacity

Standard bus

35

90

Low floor bus

35

50

Train

200

400

Fare model

The fare model includes two fare zones, which have been assigned the following stops.

Table 240: Fare model in Example_LLE.ver

Number

Name

FZ100

FZ200

10

A-Village

X

 

20

C-Village

X

 

30

B-Village

X

X

40

X-City

 

X

Stop 30 (B village) is located exactly between fare zones FZ100 and FZ200, and is therefore assigned to both fare zones.

Tickets and Fares

Table 241: Fares of the fare model in Example_LLE.ver

Fare zones

One-way ticket [CU]

Multiple trip ticket (4 trips) [CU]

Monthly pass [CU]

 

One-way fare

Fare

One-way fare

Fare

One-way fare

up to 2 fare zones

1.00

3.20

0.80

60.00

1.50

up to 3 fare zones

2.00

6.40

1.60

60.00

1.50

up to 4 fare zones

3.00

10.40

2.60

60.00

1.50

as of 4 fare zones

5.00

12.00

3.00

80.00

2.00

Additionally, a supplement of 3.00 CU (currency units: for example, Euro, Pound, Dollar) is required for each rail ticket.

Transport demand

Table 242 shows the number of passengers between the zones.

FromZone

ToZone

Line1

Line2

OD demand

A-Village

X-City

Bus1

Train

2000

X-City

A-Village

Train

Bus1

2000

A-Village

C-Village

Bus1

 

200

C-Village

A-Village

Bus1

 

200

C-Village

X-City

Train

 

5000

X-City

C-Village

Train

 

5000

B-Village

X-City

Bus1

 

2000

X-City

B-Village

Bus1

 

2000

 

Sum

18400

Table 242: Transport demand between the zones in Example_LLE.ver

Cost rates
  • Link costs

Track charge of 100 CU/km on railway track between stop 20 and stop 40, plus depreciation charge of 100000 CU. All other links have a utilization fee of 10 CU/Km and running costs of 20 CU in the analysis horizon.

  • Vehicle costs

Table 243: Cost rates for vehicles in Example_LLE.ver

 

Standard bus

Low floor bus

Train

 

Service

Empty

Service

Empty

Service

Empty

Cost rate per hour [CU/h]

300.00

200.00

300.00

200.00

700.00

500.00

Cost rate per km [CU/km]

5.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

10.00

10.00

Cost rate per vehicle [CU/Veh/AP]

7000.00

7000.00

20000.00

  • In addition, a charge of 50 CU/h is due for each vehicle combination Train.
  • The operator costs amount to annual administrative costs of 1,000 CU for the bus operator and 5,000 CU for the train operator as well as depreciation costs of 100,000 CU each.